Wednesday, 9 March 2011

Rever 2

Experimentation in Reverberation

To remain consistent in our experiments, a Rode NT2 was used in all experiments. An omni-directional polar pattern was used to capture the characteristics of the space we were recording except for our dry source recording, which used a cardioid polar pattern.

 

Euphonium Reverb

 
Euph Reverb Showreel by firemanfloaf

 

Experiment 1- Studio 160cm from source.

IMG_0858IMG_0860

             Experiment 1             Experiment 2

 

From this distance we can paint a pretty accurate picture of what the space is.  The studio is custom built to absorb as much sound as possible, resulting in a short pre-delay time and minimal early reflections. Dense reflections are barely audible.

Experiment 2 Studio 296cm.

At a significantly further distance, the essence of room is captured more successfully. However, we soon notice that the timbre of the Euphonium is jeopardised to a great degree. It shows us that when distance miking, we need to find the right balance between articulation and resonance.

 

Experiment 3- Studio dry 0.2m.

IMG_0875

Experiment 3 - Dry

The reason for this was to capture the euphonium without any sonic reflections so we could then apply it to our various reverb strips.

Experiment 4 dry with Logic's PlatinumVerb.

 This old-school style of reverb application utilises no impulse responses whatsoever and is in fact, merely a glorified synthesizer. Nonetheless, when added to our dry Euphonium track, it is clear that a substantial amount of adjustment is needed. Even with our bus assigned to post-fader, the reverberation effect appears continuous, eradicating the realism of a particular room, as reverbs main purpose should be to create an image of a real space. Despite our best efforts, even with subtle application, PlatinumVerb comes across too synthetic and forced, creating a metallic sound in some areas.

Experiment 5. Dry with Cafe Space algorithm.

Because we are using a dry sound that has been bussed to a reverb channel, we get the clarity and detail of the instrument. With the reverb applied in a separate channel, we get the happy medium we were missing from experiments 1 and 2.

Experiment 6- actual cafe space. 3.0m.

IMG_0886

Experiment 6

 

The visualisation of the space is more obvious than our previous experiment. However, the room is too reverberant for the instrument with regards to resonance, something that we have no control over. The slightest of tweaking would have sufficed in this instance.

 

These results were nearly identical when replicated in the recital room and foyer hallway. To my ears, it is better to record a solo instrument dry, and then apply the reverb subtly in a different channel. This allows for automated tweaking during mixing, something that cannot be done in a real space. There are of course, disadvantages for this application of reverb. As our dry source is close miked, we pick up all sorts of unwanted sound. For example, on a Euphhonium we pick up the sounds as the fingers press down on the valves, the player breathing etc. On guitar we pick up fret noises and scuffeles from the player. This would not happen if we recorded at distance.  Also, it is easier to hide mistakes in the actual space, whereas with a dry sound bussed , the detail is more clear and not masked with the real acoustics.

 

Perhaps another way to record would be to close mic in the recital room with an ambience mic at around 6m. This would however cause phase issues so in essence, the best method is to bus. It's easier, controllable and above all, clearer.

 

Similar tests on vocals

 
Vocals Reverb Showreel by firemanfloaf

 

 

Similar test on nylon guitar

 
Guitar Reverb Showreel by firemanfloaf

 

 

 

 

Tweaking the parameters

Experimenting with reverb


Screen shot 2011-03-09 at 19.22.14

 
Vocals Reverb Showreel by firemanfloaf

To prepare the reverb effect, an auxiliary channel was created with the Logic’s space designer plug-in. The original source was then bussed to that auxiliary strip. For demonstration purposes I have selected a bright hall preset, not because of the name, but because I have used it in the past and found it appeals to many of my recordings. The reverberation toggle was set to full (0.0db) and the dry toggle was set to mute. This was in order to isolate the reverberation and so we would not hear an increase in track volume, thus keeping the reverb effect separate from the track. Had we just applied the space designer setting to the original track, we would have just heard a straight manipulation of the track , which in turn would have produced some disastrous results. So, in theory it is better to bus to an auxiliary.

After much experimentation, it was clear only a small amount of gain was needed on the bus toggle (c20%). The next thing to be done was to experiment with the reverb length. However, it was not an important focus in this case as we are only applying it to a single track . Had this been a complete mix with multiple instruments, more consideration would have to be given to make sure the reverb length did not jeopardise the mix. Still, after sweeping through various reverb lengths, 1.436s seemed to suit this particular track as it provided the track with warmth and sounded natural without effecting the timbre of the original track.

On the auxiliary strip, EQ was applied to reduce some of the higher frequencies as with most sonic reflections, the higher frequencies die out, leaving the resonance in the lower frequencies. This enhanced the richness of the room and slightly adjusted the characteristics of the space.

 The spectrum analyser within the EQ was used to monitor the reverb, paying close attention to any prominent frequency- response peaks as they would make the whole effect too obvious.   

 

 

 

Convolution and creating impulse responses

In order to compare our tracks recorded in a real environment with their identical synthesised reverbs , impulse responses were taken from the Foyle Arts, cafe space, foyer hallway and recital room.

A singular Genelec HT208 monitor was placed in each environment, with a Singular Rode NT2 (omni-directional) placed approximately 3.0m away in order to pick up the room's characteristics along with our generated sound. A sine sweep was then played through the monitor sweeping from around 10Hz - 20kHz. These impulse responses were then deconvolved using Apple's Impulse Response Utility. These impulse responses have been applied to our 3 test instruments (Voice,Euphonium and Acoustic Nylon Guitar).

 

A summary of each space's characteristics

Screen shot 2011-03-09 at 19.28.58

 

The Recital Room has a high ceiling and wide walls, resulting in a longer pre-delay time. This space was the most stentorian of the 3. Although there were many small obstructions in the room (e.g. chairs, piano), the identity of the hall is prominent, ideal if we wanted to create that specific environment.

mt3

 

Cafe Space

The laminate wood flooring of the space, coupled with PVC walls produced the earliest reflections. The weaker reflected sound waves combine with the pre-delay onset to produce an ugly 'glass bowl' effect.

mt2

 

Foyer Hallway.

This was the most intriguing out of the 3 spaces. Not only is it a long corridor, it also has steps to the side which lead to additional square space but confusingly has a high ceiling. This sonic confusion is evident in the impulse response. Upon listening to the auxiliary reverb on solo, it is evident that the early reflections combine with, albeit very subtle, late reflections from this additional space. Although this prominently dense space is intriguing to the ear, with regards to our test instruments, it would not fit into any of our exhibits.



mt4

 

Reverberation

Experimentation in Reverberation

To remain consistent in our experiments, a Rode NT2 was used in all experiments. An omni-directional polar pattern was used to capture the characteristics of the space we were recording except for our dry source recording, which used a cardioid polar pattern.

 

Euphonium Reverb

 

Experiment 1- Studio 160cm from source.

IMG_0858IMG_0860

             Experiment 1             Experiment 2

 

From this distance we can paint a pretty accurate picture of what the space is.  The studio is custom built to absorb as much sound as possible, resulting in a short pre-delay time and minimal early reflections. Dense reflections are barely audible.

Experiment 2 Studio 296cm.

At a significantly further distance, the essence of room is captured more successfully. However, we soon notice that the timbre of the Euphonium is jeopardised to a great degree. It shows us that when distance miking, we need to find the right balance between articulation and resonance.

 

Experiment 3- Studio dry 0.2m.

IMG_0875

Experiment 3 - Dry

The reason for this was to capture the euphonium without any sonic reflections so we could then apply it to our various reverb strips.

Experiment 4 dry with Logic's PlatinumVerb.

 This old-school style of reverb application utilises no impulse responses whatsoever and is in fact, merely a glorified synthesizer. Nonetheless, when added to our dry Euphonium track, it is clear that a substantial amount of adjustment is needed. Even with our bus assigned to post-fader, the reverberation effect appears continuous, eradicating the realism of a particular room, as reverbs main purpose should be to create an image of a real space. Despite our best efforts, even with subtle application, PlatinumVerb comes across too synthetic and forced, creating a metallic sound in some areas.

Experiment 5. Dry with Cafe Space algorithm.

Because we are using a dry sound that has been bussed to a reverb channel, we get the clarity and detail of the instrument. With the reverb applied in a separate channel, we get the happy medium we were missing from experiments 1 and 2.

Experiment 6- actual cafe space. 3.0m.

IMG_0886

Experiment 6

 

The visualisation of the space is more obvious than our previous experiment. However, the room is too reverberant for the instrument with regards to resonance, something that we have no control over. The slightest of tweaking would have sufficed in this instance.

 

These results were nearly identical when replicated in the recital room and foyer hallway. To my ears, it is better to record a solo instrument dry, and then apply the reverb subtly in a different channel. This allows for automated tweaking during mixing, something that cannot be done in a real space. There are of course, disadvantages for this application of reverb. As our dry source is close miked, we pick up all sorts of unwanted sound. For example, on a Euphhonium we pick up the sounds as the fingers press down on the valves, the player breathing etc. On guitar we pick up fret noises and scuffeles from the player. This would not happen if we recorded at distance.  Also, it is easier to hide mistakes in the actual space, whereas with a dry sound bussed , the detail is more clear and not masked with the real acoustics.

 

Perhaps another way to record would be to close mic in the recital room with an ambience mic at around 6m. This would however cause phase issues so in essence, the best method is to bus. It's easier, controllable and above all, clearer.

 

 

 

 

 

Tweaking the parameters

Experimenting with reverb


Screen shot 2011-03-09 at 19.22.14

 

To prepare the reverb effect, an auxiliary channel was created with the Logic’s space designer plug-in. The original source was then bussed to that auxiliary strip. For demonstration purposes I have selected a bright hall preset, not because of the name, but because I have used it in the past and found it appeals to many of my recordings. The reverberation toggle was set to full (0.0db) and the dry toggle was set to mute. This was in order to isolate the reverberation and so we would not hear an increase in track volume, thus keeping the reverb effect separate from the track. Had we just applied the space designer setting to the original track, we would have just heard a straight manipulation of the track , which in turn would have produced some disastrous results. So, in theory it is better to bus to an auxiliary.

After much experimentation, it was clear only a small amount of gain was needed on the bus toggle (c20%). The next thing to be done was to experiment with the reverb length. However, it was not an important focus in this case as we are only applying it to a single track . Had this been a complete mix with multiple instruments, more consideration would have to be given to make sure the reverb length did not jeopardise the mix. Still, after sweeping through various reverb lengths, 1.436s seemed to suit this particular track as it provided the track with warmth and sounded natural without effecting the timbre of the original track.

On the auxiliary strip, EQ was applied to reduce some of the higher frequencies as with most sonic reflections, the higher frequencies die out, leaving the resonance in the lower frequencies. This enhanced the richness of the room and slightly adjusted the characteristics of the space.

 The spectrum analyser within the EQ was used to monitor the reverb, paying close attention to any prominent frequency- response peaks as they would make the whole effect too obvious.   

 

 

 

Convolution and creating impulse responses

In order to compare our tracks recorded in a real environment with their identical synthesised reverbs , impulse responses were taken from the Foyle Arts, cafe space, foyer hallway and recital room.

A singular Genelec HT208 monitor was placed in each environment, with a Singular Rode NT2 (omni-directional) placed approximately 3.0m away in order to pick up the room's characteristics along with our generated sound. A sine sweep was then played through the monitor sweeping from around 10Hz - 20kHz. These impulse responses were then deconvolved using Apple's Impulse Response Utility. These impulse responses have been applied to our 3 test instruments (Voice,Euphonium and Acoustic Nylon Guitar).

 

A summary of each space's characteristics

Screen shot 2011-03-09 at 19.28.58

 

The Recital Room has a high ceiling and wide walls, resulting in a longer pre-delay time. This space was the most stentorian of the 3. Although there were many small obstructions in the room (e.g. chairs, piano), the identity of the hall is prominent, ideal if we wanted to create that specific environment.

mt3

 

Cafe Space

The laminate wood flooring of the space, coupled with PVC walls produced the earliest reflections. The weaker reflected sound waves combine with the pre-delay onset to produce an ugly 'glass bowl' effect.

mt2

 

Foyer Hallway.

This was the most intriguing out of the 3 spaces. Not only is it a long corridor, it also has steps to the side which lead to additional square space but confusingly has a high ceiling. This sonic confusion is evident in the impulse response. Upon listening to the auxiliary reverb on solo, it is evident that the early reflections combine with, albeit very subtle, late reflections from this additional space. Although this prominently dense space is intriguing to the ear, with regards to our test instruments, it would not fit into any of our exhibits.


mt4

 

Wednesday, 2 March 2011

Recording Vocals

Evidently, different microphones suit different situations.

On this occasion we are recording pop vocals beginning with the SM58.

If the manufacturer's specifications are anything to go by, we should expect a good clarity of presence around the 2-5kHz region.

After initiating a mic sweep we found that the best sound for vocals came from positioning the mic around 0.2m away from the source.


IMG_0731

 
SM58 0.2m from source by firemanfloaf






It would be naïve of us to judge the sound in isolation or without comparison, so let's listen to the same verse but on a Neumann U87 condenser recorded 0.5m away (post audio sweep).

 

IMG_0796


 
Neumann U87 0.53m from source. by firemanfloaf


                                                       (-10db, cardioid polar pattern)

 

Now it gets interesting.  First of all, compared to the U87, the SM58 sound appears to be quite thin and precise.  The U87 wins hands down with regards to the lower frequency response as it brings a warm sonorous quality around 100Hz.  However, this does not deem the SM58 ineffective.

The graph below represents the comparison in frequency response between the two.

 

 

Screen shot 2011-02-21 at 14.12.00

This presence area (2-5kHz) would cut through hard, muffled sounds at a live gig so it is easy to see why many live engineers favour it.

Another perk of the SM58 is its response to background noise. Thanks to its pneumatic shock-mount system, we can barley notice the raucous noise coming from the above recital room.  With the U87, it is apparent that there is spill from our noisy environment.

It would appear advantageous to consider using a condenser (in comparison with a dynamic). The U87's impressive linear response will mean that less post EQ will be required.

However, in a live situation, an SM58 has the ability to cut through heavy/dull sounds.

Summary

SM58 – Sharp and Tough

U87 - Clear and Meticulous

 

Which Cardioid for Vocals?

Regarding the recording of vocals, let's compare the Neumann U87 with the AKG 414, another cardioid.

Using headphone sweep again, we eventually settled on 0.2m as the optimum distance.



IMG_0811

 
AKG 414 - 0.2m - 0.5m by firemanfloaf



Listening to the AKG timbre, it appears quite harsh with our vocals.   Like the U87, it handles low frequencies with ease but the AKG is lacking presence.  I wouldn’t preclude the possibility that this is a direct result of the close proximity of our mic in relation to the source. However, could the AKG 414 be more suited for speech and instrumental recording?

 

To be sure, I recoded the same again but this time at 0.5m.

Instantly, the sound we heard was extremely muffled.  This shows us how sensitive the AKG 414 is at distances.  The U87 is able to handle a similar distance comfortably. 

 

Setting reverberation and acoustics aside, the U87 appears to be the best option with regards to recording male pop vocals.  This could all change however depending on the age/weight/style of the singer. 



Recording Guitar

 

 

 

 

 

Shure SM58

After sweeping we began recording at a distance of 0.2m.  The sound from the SM58 appeared to be high in presence, but not so successful around 150Hz.  Pointing at the sound hole definitely makes our recording bass heavy. However, when we move it just off centre (towards bridge), we are left with a cleaner timbre. 

 

Neumann U87

The Neumann U87 produces an ‘60s’ sound.  It certainly comes across muffled.  If we gave the U87 a score of 10 for hardness, the guitar would figure around 5.  If we are trying to pair hard mics with soft instruments, maybe the U87 is not the best for guitar.

 

AKG 414

The AKG 414 is constantly impressive in the instrumental experiments.  On guitar it gives the brightest tone of all microphones tested (especially in cardiod and -10db settings). If we were to combine an AKG with an SM58 this might give more body to solo guitar tracks.

 

 

 


Recording Flute/Low Whistle

 

 
Low Flute - All Mics by firemanfloaf



 

 


Similar to flute, mic placement on a low whistle can be quite tricky due to the excess air omitted from the sound hole. From the mic experiments conducted, it is evident we must keep a safe distance from the sound hole, while at the same time trying not to stray too far from the source so that the quality is not jeopardised.  We found that a foam pop guard can help reduce excess air omitted.

 

SM58

After sweeping, we began recording at a distance of 0.2m.  The SM58 produces a clean tone but lacks depth and fullness.  

Of all the recordings, this one was so high in presence that it actually hurt our ears, even with when keeping all signal strength constant.  However, the sound was clear and detailed, but lacked in richness.  At 0.5m, the sound becomes very echoey, with some elements of phase creeping in

 

U87

The Neumann U87, like the vocal recordings, captures sonority in the lower frequencies and a mellowness in the higher frequencies.  It subtly captures the characteristics of the space it is recorded in without interfering too much with the source itself.  However, when we change from 0.3m to 1.0m recording distance, it does not cope well at all.   It almost sounds like the Low Whistle was recorded in a bathroom.

 

AKG

After sweeping and trying to find the optimum polar pattern, we eventually settled on a distance of  0.3m.

When we had previously been disappointed with the AKG’s performance with pop vocals, it was hard to know what to expect when it came to wind intruments.

However, the AKG came up trumps, producing a clean, detailed tone with just the right amount of low end to allow for minimal post EQ.  Even at a distance of 0.6m it still sounds consistant.

 



 

Experimentations – Mid - Side Technique

Patented in 1934 by Alan Blumlein, this method became popular in the early 1950s, mainly thanks to Danish radio engineer, Holger Lauridson.

The Idea:

The aim of this technique is to create atmospheric stereo sound, using two mono microphones.

 

To begin this experiment:

We placed a mid mic (Rode NT3) pointing directly at our source (pipes).  Before positioning our side mic, it was imperative to firstly sweep with our NT3 using a cardiod polar pattern.  After the optimum sound was acquired, an AKG 414 was placed at an angle (90º) using a coincidental placement technique. 

 

IMG_0818

The AKG was set to a figure of 8 polar pattern to pick up the side environment.

Recording the two tracks was not enough as the phase needed to be flipped to create the stereo effect we were attempting to achieve.

m+s = x

m-s = y

 

 

Below I have included a video that I have created to explain the detailed process of flipping the phase in order to ‘activate’ the stereo imagery.

 



 

 

 

 

Listening to our example,it appears that we have created an ambient stereo sound using two mono microphones.  There is absolutely no need for a matched pair.  The sound produced here would, in my opinion, suit a choir or even guitar/drum overheads.  It gives an alternative sound that may benefit textured recordings.  Rather impressively, there is a certain crispness to the sound that would simply be hard to replicate with a mono microphones.

 

What may be useful to consider in the future is the inclusion of a ribbon mic as a side.  This may bring a different quality to the recordings.  

 

 

 

Experimentations-Unorthodox Techniques.

Watching a documentary on rock band Franz Ferdinand inspired me to think outside the box with regard to mic experimentation and exploration.

In the following exerpt, Alex Kapranos (lead singer/guitarist) plays his Fender in a disused hall in Glasgow.  Engineer Dan Carey (Kylie Minogue, Hot Chip) curiously swings a suspended dynamic mic back and forward like a pendulum.





 






 The Idea:

 

To experiment with the Doppler Effect, thus creating a unique and intriguing result.

 

Does it work?:

 

In theory it sounds interesting, but the effect didn't quite translate to the final recording.

A dynamic mic was definetly the right mic to use due to the extended cable length, the ability to work without phantom power and the tolerance of backround noise.

However this idea is riddled with problems:

1)   There is always going to be tension on the XLR cable because of the material it is made from and the way in which it is suspended.  XLR cables are not designed to be tightly swung from ceilings.

2)   Phase problems will be intensified due to the room and ever changing distances of the mic.

3)   If Carey was aiming for a pitch change it was never going to work as the mic is directly swinging into the amplifier's sound spectrum.  In order for the Doppler Effect to happen, sound cannot bounce off the source that perceives the sound.

Perhaps they should have tried the opposite, moving the amp and not the mic.



photo






In keeping with unconventional recording techniques, here is the result of an improvised recording session with an empty 2 litre plastic bottle.

 

The Idea:

To direct sound energy towards a hole like water flowing down a drain.

 

The Method:

The bottom of an empty 2 litre water bottle was cut out.  An SM58 was then carefully pushed through on a mic stand.   The aim was to get it as close to the hole as possible without touching the plastic.  The intended result was that this would stop outside noise spilling into the mic, creating an isolated sound.

 

Results:

Although this is considered a massive failure, like the Carey experiment, we learn more about what definitely doesn't work, as apposed to what does.

If we listen to the recording we can hear that the bottle acts as a filter.  In fact, the sound energy is reverberating against the plastic first before it is absorbed by the SM58.  Perhaps a different material that can absorb sound better (e.g carpet) would have been more successful.  
 
Bottle Filter - Preferably Deep River Rock by firemanfloaf

 

 

 

 

Grill Removal of SM58

The excerpt below contains a normal recording of an Accordion using an SM58.

If we remove the grill we are exposed to a different sound all together.  From personal experience the sound resembles that of an SM57, sharper and crisper.  However, the grill acts as a pop shield, while at the same time protecting the mic from vapour damage.

 

 

 
SM 58 grill on grill off by firemanfloaf

 

 

 

 

Assistant Engineer : Paul Harrigan

Musicians :Paul Harrigan and Jason Blyth

References:

DPA Microphones

Mid-Side Microphones

Shure Microphines

Franz Ferdinand Documentary

In Class Notes/Slides